Approaches to clinical problem solving - formulation of differential diagnoses

The skill

Systematic differential diagnosis formulation - generating a structured list of possible diagnoses ranked by probability and/or severity, rather than fixating on a single leading hypothesis - is the core analytical ("System 2") counterpart to intuitive pattern recognition, particularly important for atypical presentations or when missing a specific diagnosis carries high consequence
A foundational clinical reasoning skill applied to essentially every clinical presentation, with the specific approach and thoroughness appropriately varying with presentation complexity and diagnostic stakes

A well-formulated differential should explicitly consider both probability (what is statistically most likely given the presentation and population) and severity/consequence (what would be dangerous to miss, even if statistically less likely) as separate, complementary dimensions - a systematic approach (e.g. organising by anatomical system, by pathophysiological category, or by "can't miss" diagnoses specifically) helps ensure both dimensions are adequately considered rather than defaulting to only the most probable diagnosis

Investigation selection should be explicitly guided by which differential diagnoses on the list most need to be confirmed or excluded, rather than ordering tests reflexively without a clear diagnostic question in mind
The differential should be actively revisited and revised as new information (history, examination, investigation results) becomes available, rather than being fixed at the initial assessment and not updated

A structured, explicitly considered differential diagnosis (rather than an intuitive single leading diagnosis alone) directly guides targeted, appropriate investigation and reduces the risk of missing a less probable but dangerous diagnosis
Documenting the differential diagnosis and reasoning supports both continuity of care (another clinician can see and build on the reasoning) and structured reassessment as new information emerges

"Can't miss" diagnosis inclusion regardless of statistical probability, probability vs severity as separate differential-ranking dimensions, investigation selection guided by the differential rather than reflexive test ordering, differential revision as new information emerges
A well-formulated differential diagnosis explicitly considers both probability and severity as separate dimensions - a "can't miss" diagnosis should remain on the list and be actively excluded even when statistically less likely than the leading hypothesis, since the consequence of missing it (not just its probability) should influence how much diagnostic effort is directed toward confirming or excluding it

4 more sections, plus exam facts

Premium unlocks every note across every specialty, and the full exam fact library behind it.