Non-invasive methods of assessing liver fibrosis, such as transient elastography
The goal
- Goal: identify ADVANCED FIBROSIS and PORTAL HYPERTENSION without a biopsy
- Fibrosis stage is the single strongest predictor of liver-related outcomes - the grade of inflammation is not
- Two families of test:
- Serum panels - simple (FIB-4, APRI, NAFLD fibrosis score) or proprietary (ELF, FibroTest)
- Imaging elastography - vibration-controlled transient elastography (FibroScan), 2D shear-wave elastography, MR elastography
- Two-step pathway is now standard: a cheap, sensitive rule-OUT test first (FIB-4), then elastography only in the indeterminate/high group
Why non-invasive tests
- MASLD affects ~1 in 3 Australian adults; ~20-25% have MASH, ~5% advanced fibrosis
- Population prevalence is why biopsying everyone is impossible - hence these tests
- FIB-4 <1.3 excludes advanced fibrosis in ~60-70% of a primary-care MASLD population at one stroke
- FibroScan failure/unreliable measurement ~5-15%, almost all obesity-related
How elastography works and what confounds it
- Elastography measures the speed of a shear wave through liver tissue; stiffness (kPa) rises with collagen content
- *Stiffness is not fibrosis alone* - it rises with anything that raises tissue pressure:
- Acute hepatitis (high ALT), cholestasis/biliary obstruction, hepatic congestion (right heart failure), food in the stomach, amyloid, infiltration
- -> fast for at least 3 hours, and do not measure during an ALT flare
- Serum panels use surrogates of fibrosis physiology: falling platelets (portal hypertension, dec thrombopoietin), rising AST:ALT ratio, and matrix turnover markers (ELF)
Serum scores
A. Serum scores
| Score | Components | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| FIB-4 | Age, AST, ALT, platelets | <1.3 rules out advanced fibrosis (NPV >90%); >2.67 rules in. Use <2.0 as the lower cut-off if age >65 - it over-calls in the elderly |
| APRI | AST:platelet ratio | Good negative predictive value for cirrhosis; <0.5 rules out, >1.0 rules in |
| NAFLD fibrosis score | Age, BMI, IFG/diabetes, AST/ALT, platelets, albumin | Useful where obesity limits FibroScan |
| ELF panel | Hyaluronic acid, PIIINP, TIMP-1 | Direct matrix markers; >9.8 suggests advanced fibrosis. An alternative in obesity |
- All serum panels perform worse in the middle of their range - that is the point of the two-step pathway
Transient elastography (FibroScan)
B. Transient elastography (FibroScan)
- Median of >=10 valid measurements; report requires IQR/median <=30%
- Cirrhosis: <12.5 kPa makes it unlikely (very high NPV); >12.5 kPa makes it likely
- Baveno VIII "Rule of Five" for compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD)
| LSM (kPa) | Meaning |
|---|---|
| <5 | Normal - rules out cACLD |
| 5-10 | cACLD unlikely without other evidence |
| 10-15 | cACLD likely |
| 15-20 | cACLD highly likely |
| >=20-25 | Clinically significant portal hypertension likely |
- LSM <15 kPa + platelets >150 = CSPH excluded -> varices unlikely -> endoscopy can be avoided (Baveno favourable criteria)
- *In MASLD with obesity, the >=25 kPa rule-in threshold for CSPH is unreliable* - integrate BMI, platelets, spleen stiffness and other NITs (Baveno VIII)
- Spleen stiffness measurement is now part of the backbone of non-invasive CSPH assessment
- CAP (controlled attenuation parameter) on the same machine quantifies steatosis, not fibrosis
Where each fails
C. Where each fails
| Problem | Effect | Alternative |
|---|---|---|
| Obesity, narrow intercostal spaces, ascites | Failed or unreliable FibroScan | XL probe, MR elastography, NAFLD fibrosis score or ELF |
| Acute hepatitis, cholestasis, congestion, recent meal, alcohol binge | Falsely high stiffness | Repeat when settled |
| Age >65 | FIB-4 over-calls | Raise the cut-off to 2.0 |
Liver biopsy - still the reference
D. Liver biopsy - still the reference
- Indications now narrow: discordant non-invasive tests, suspected coexisting disease, unexplained abnormality, or a trial/drug eligibility requirement
- Samples ~1/50,000 of the liver - sampling error, inter-observer variation
- Risks: pain ~30%, significant bleeding ~1 in 500, death ~1 in 10,000
- Transjugular route if coagulopathy or ascites (and allows HVPG measurement)
What the result changes
- Low risk (FIB-4 <1.3 / LSM <8 kPa) -> manage metabolic risk in primary care; repeat in 2-3 years
- Indeterminate -> elastography or ELF; if still indeterminate, specialist referral
- High risk (LSM >=10 kPa, FIB-4 >2.67) -> hepatology referral
- HCC surveillance: 6-monthly ultrasound once cirrhotic
- Varices - endoscopy unless Baveno favourable criteria met; carvedilol if CSPH
- Vaccinate (hepatitis A/B), avoid alcohol, review hepatotoxic drugs
- MASH with F2-F3 fibrosis -> now a treatment indication, not just observation
- Resmetirom (thyroid hormone receptor-beta agonist) - first agent approved for MASH with F2-F3; not TGA/PBS-funded in Australia
- GLP-1 RA (semaglutide) and tirzepatide - weight loss, MASH resolution
- Bariatric surgery where BMI criteria met
- Weight loss targets: 5% for steatosis, 7-10% for MASH resolution, >10% for fibrosis regression
Monitoring
- Repeat non-invasive testing rather than repeat biopsy - annually in high risk, 2-3 yearly if low
- *A falling LSM after treatment (or alcohol abstinence, or HCV cure) predicts improved outcomes* - but does not remove HCC surveillance if cirrhosis was established
Use cases
- MASLD/MASH - the dominant use case; renamed from NAFLD/NASH (2023 Delphi consensus)
- MetALD = metabolic dysfunction + significant alcohol intake
- Chronic hepatitis B and C - staging, and post-cure follow-up
- Alcohol-related liver disease - avoid measuring during a binge or acute hepatitis; stiffness falls substantially with abstinence
- Haemochromatosis - FibroScan and MRI have largely replaced biopsy for staging
- PBC/PSC - elastography validated, but cholestasis raises stiffness independently
- Right heart failure / Fontan circulation - congestive hepatopathy raises stiffness with little fibrosis
- Amyloid, lymphoma, extramedullary haematopoiesis - infiltration raises stiffness
Fibrosis predicts outcome
- *Fibrosis stage, not steatosis or inflammation, predicts liver-related and all-cause mortality*
- F0-F1: no excess liver mortality. F3-F4: markedly increased
- LSM predicts outcomes continuously - each increment raises decompensation and HCC risk
- Fibrosis regresses with the removal of the driver (alcohol, HCV cure, weight loss, venesection) - cirrhosis can even "recompensate" (Baveno)
- Repeat testing beats a single value - a rising LSM over years identifies the progressor
- The commonest cause of death in MASLD remains cardiovascular, not liver - manage the cardiometabolic risk regardless of the fibrosis result
🔒
10 more sections, plus exam facts
Premium unlocks every note across every specialty, and the full exam fact library behind it.
Get premium access