Assessment of performance status, such as ECOG performance status and Karnofsky performance status scale
What it is
- A single ordinal measure of functional capacity - the most powerful and most used prognostic variable in oncology
- Determines trial eligibility, treatment intensity, and whether systemic therapy is offered at all
- *An objective statement of what the patient can do, not how they feel or how unwell they look*
Use and prognostic value
- ECOG (WHO/Zubrod) is the standard in Australian practice; Karnofsky used in transplant, radiation oncology and palliative care
- Independently prognostic in essentially every tumour type, often outweighing stage
- Poor performance status is the commonest reason patients are excluded from clinical trials - hence trial populations are fitter than clinic populations
What it reflects
- Reflects the integrated burden of tumour, comorbidity, treatment toxicity, nutrition, sarcopenia and psychological state
- Deterioration may be from:
- Progressive cancer (irreversible)
- Reversible causes - anaemia, hypercalcaemia, hypothyroidism, adrenal insufficiency, infection, pain, opioid excess, depression, deconditioning, malnutrition
- *Always ask whether poor performance status is fixed or fixable before withholding treatment*
ECOG performance status
ECOG performance status
| Grade | Definition |
|---|---|
| 0 | Fully active, no restriction |
| 1 | Restricted in strenuous activity; able to do light or sedentary work (housework, office work) |
| 2 | Ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to work; up and about >50% of waking hours |
| 3 | Capable of only limited self-care; confined to bed or chair >50% of waking hours |
| 4 | Completely disabled; no self-care; totally confined to bed or chair |
| 5 | Dead |
Karnofsky - 0 to 100 in steps of 10
| Karnofsky | ECOG equivalent |
|---|---|
| 100-90 | 0 |
| 80-70 | 1 |
| 60-50 | 2 |
| 40-30 | 3 |
| 20-10 | 4 |
- 90 normal activity, minor signs; 80 normal activity with effort; 70 cares for self, unable to work; 50 requires considerable assistance and frequent medical care; 30 severely disabled, hospitalisation indicated
The clinical dividing lines
- ECOG 0-1 - eligible for most trials and full-intensity systemic therapy
- ECOG 2 - the grey zone; single agent, dose reduction, or best supportive care depending on whether the cause is the cancer
- If ECOG 2 is driven by tumour burden in a treatment-sensitive cancer, treat; if by comorbidity and frailty, usually do not
- ECOG 3-4 - *cytotoxic chemotherapy generally causes harm without benefit*
- Exceptions: highly chemosensitive disease (germ cell tumour, small cell lung cancer, lymphoma, acute leukaemia), or an actionable driver where an oral TKI can produce a rapid response
- ECOG >=3 with progressive disease on prior lines - a strong signal to move to supportive care
How to assess it properly
- Ask what the patient actually did yesterday, hour by hour - not "how are you coping?"
- "How much of the day are you in bed or in a chair?" - the >50% threshold separates 2 from 3
- Cross-check with the carer; patients over-report function and clinicians under-rate it
- Reassess at every visit - performance status is dynamic and a fall between cycles is a red flag
- Record it in the notes with the date - it is a longitudinal variable
Complementary assessments
- Geriatric assessment in patients >=65-70 - the G8 screening tool, then comprehensive geriatric assessment
- *Performance status alone under-detects vulnerability in older adults* - it misses cognition, polypharmacy, falls, nutrition and social supports
- CGA-guided care reduces chemotherapy toxicity without compromising outcomes (GAP70+, GAIN)
- Frailty indices, sarcopenia on CT (L3 muscle index)
- Australia-modified Karnofsky (AKPS) and Palliative Performance Scale in palliative care
- Patient-reported outcome measures
Associations
- Independently prognostic in lung, colorectal, breast, prostate, ovarian cancer and lymphoma
- Component of prognostic scores: IPI (lymphoma), IMDC (renal), IGCCCG (germ cell), MASCC (febrile neutropenia), Glasgow Prognostic Score
- Correlates with sarcopenia, weight loss, inflammatory markers (CRP, albumin), symptom burden
- Determines eligibility for cisplatin (ECOG >2 = ineligible), high-dose therapy and stem cell transplant, and most clinical trials
- Falling performance status is a trigger for advance care planning and palliative care referral
Prognosis
- Declining performance status is one of the most reliable predictors of short prognosis - a fall from ECOG 1 to 3 over weeks suggests a life expectancy measured in weeks to a few months
- Median survival in advanced solid tumours roughly halves with each ECOG grade
- Performance status may improve with effective treatment of a highly responsive cancer, or with correction of a reversible cause - do not treat it as immutable at a single time point
- *Chemotherapy given in the last 30 days of life confers no benefit and increases the chance of dying in hospital* - performance status trajectory is the best available warning
- Discuss goals of care once ECOG reaches 3, or when it falls by 2 grades between cycles
🔒
9 more sections, plus exam facts
Premium unlocks every note across every specialty, and the full exam fact library behind it.
Get premium access