Hierarchy of evidence in study design
Core concept
For a question of treatment efficacy
| Level | Design |
|---|---|
| 1 | Systematic review / meta-analysis of RCTs |
| 2 | Individual RCT (adequately powered, low risk of bias) |
| 3 | Non-randomised controlled / cohort study |
| 4 | Case-control study |
| 5 | Case series, cross-sectional, case report |
| 6 | Expert opinion, bench/animal work, mechanistic reasoning |
- Randomisation is what buys causal inference - it balances unmeasured confounders, which no analytical adjustment can do
- A poorly conducted meta-analysis of poor trials sits below one excellent RCT. The hierarchy ranks designs, GRADE ranks the actual evidence.
3 more sections, plus exam facts
Premium unlocks every note across every specialty, and the full exam fact library behind it.
Get premium access